Skip to main content

Structured context

Messy in. Typed out.

Respondents type like people. The agent maps that into fields, then ships a webhook payload and an MCP-ready object.

Structured context

Speak to the form agent. Get structured context.

People chat or leave a voice note. The agent listens on the left. Crystal-clear fields come out the other side: company, meeting time, intent, and a payload your stack can use.

Speaking to the agent

Chat

When can you talk?

yeah tuesday works

after 3 is better

Voice

0:18

budget around forty k. need it before the offsite.

Chat

What company is this for?

acme inc, east coast team

Structured context

Sample intake. Illustrative fill, not live traffic.

Convex

Typed fields land in the dashboard as a complete record.

Webhook

The same object fires to your endpoint, not a CSV dump.

MCP

Existing agents can read the submission without scraping chat.

Why it matters

Agents need objects, not screenshots of chat

A freeform reply, a company name typed loosely, a PDF dropped in the thread, and a short voice note can become company, meeting_at, intent, and a file URL. The dashboard shows the fields. Your webhook receives the same object.

That is structured context. It is the difference between a conversation you have to reread and a record another agent can use.

The transform on this page is a sample intake. It is illustrative, not live traffic. The live path is the published form you build and the destinations you configure.

Sample record

What ships after the chat

company
text
Northwind Labs
meeting_at
datetime
2026-08-25T15:00:00Z
intent
choice
pilot
brief
file
intake.pdf

Ready to collect answers without a page of fields?

Publish a conversation. The agent keeps asking until every required block is filled.